Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 24
Filter
1.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 45(7): 1007-1009, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1930393
4.
J Clin Med ; 10(20)2021 Oct 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1470904

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate the technical and clinical success of trans-arterial embolization (TAE) as a treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and to describe its safety; moreover, we describe the characteristics of these patients. METHODS: Thirty-four COVID-19 hospitalized patients presented with GIB. Risk factors, drugs administered for COVID-19 infection, and clinical and biological parameters were evaluated. Furthermore, intraprocedural data and outcomes of embolization were analyzed. RESULTS: GIB was more frequent in male. Overweight, hypertension, diabetes, previous cardiac disease, and anticoagulation preadmission (48.5%) were frequently found in our population. Previous or actual COVID Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and a high level of D-dimer were encountered in most cases. Upper GIB was more frequent than lower GIB. Technical and clinical success rates of embolization were 88.2% and 94.1%, respectively. The complication rate was 5.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the most frequent characteristics of COVID-19 patients with GIB. Embolization is feasible, effective, and safe.

5.
Melanoma Res ; 31(5): 490-493, 2021 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1371755

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 vaccination has been rapidly implemented among patients with cancer. We present the case of a patient with high-risk resected cutaneous melanoma, who was a candidate for adjuvant treatment, with postsurgery 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) scan showing positive axillary lymph nodes after COVID-19 vaccination. This report presents a 50-year-old man with a history of stage IIA cutaneous melanoma. During follow-up, the patient experienced subcutaneous and lymph-node disease progression, documented with 18FDG PET/CT scan. The patient underwent laparoscopic left para-aortic lymphadenectomy and excision of subcutaneous lesion. Histologic examination showed presence of melanoma metastases in 2 lymph nodes out of total 17 excised and neoplastic emboli to the subcutaneous tissue. In view of starting adjuvant nivolumab, the patient underwent CT scan restaging, with evidence of suspect centimetric periaortic and paracaval lymph nodes, which were deemed worthy of 18FDG PET investigation. The 18FDG PET/CT was negative for abdominal hypercaptation, but showed left axillary pathologic lymph nodes. The medical history of the patient revealed that he had received intramuscular Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in the left deltoid, one week before 18FDG PET examination. Since the patient's clinical examination was negative and suspecting postvaccination false-positive adenopathy, bilateral axillary ultrasound was performed, excluding the presence of pathologic lymph nodes. The patient has started adjuvant treatment with nivolumab, which is currently ongoing. This case demonstrates unexpected findings in response to COVID-19 vaccination in a patient with melanoma. In this specific case, the detection of 18FDG PET hypercaptation could significantly change the patient's management. With growing evidence about the pattern and occurrence of adenopathies after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, recommendations for scheduling and interpretation of 18FDG PET/CT scans among cancer patients will be implemented, in order to reduce equivocal findings and improve outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Melanoma/pathology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Disease Progression , Humans , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Melanoma/diagnostic imaging , Middle Aged
6.
J Clin Med ; 10(7)2021 Mar 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1178296

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous transhepatic lithotripsy (PTL) using an electro-hydraulic (EH) system for difficult bile stones. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated two patients with recurrent cholangitis, jaundice and fever for the presence of difficult bile stones, inaccessible by an endoscopic approach, treated with PTL. Both procedures were conducted using the same protocol, with two different accesses. The treatments were performed using a 10 Fr flexible choledoscopy SpyGlass DSTM for visualization and an EH system for lithotripsy. RESULTS: Technical success, clinical success and complications were evaluated. The two procedures were successfully concluded in both patients without any residual stones in the biliary tree. For both patients, a short follow-up period of six months was available, during which they remained asymptomatic. Neither major nor minor complications were registered. CONCLUSION: PTL was determined to be an effective and safe technique. This procedure allows a direct visualization of the stone, reducing fluoroscopy time and permitting a less invasive and less traumatic method for the percutaneous management of difficult bile stones. Advances in knowledge: The direct visualization, the high quality of the digital view, the adequate length of the device and the less traumatic approach of EH systems represent advantages compared with other available technologies.

7.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 6940, 2021 03 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1152875

ABSTRACT

A better understanding of temporal relationships between chest CT and labs may provide a reference for disease severity over the disease course. Generalized curves of lung opacity volume and density over time can be used as standardized references from well before symptoms develop to over a month after recovery, when residual lung opacities remain. 739 patients with COVID-19 underwent CT and RT-PCR in an outbreak setting between January 21st and April 12th, 2020. 29 of 739 patients had serial exams (121 CTs and 279 laboratory measurements) over 50 ± 16 days, with an average of 4.2 sequential CTs each. Sequential volumes of total lung, overall opacity and opacity subtypes (ground glass opacity [GGO] and consolidation) were extracted using deep learning and manual segmentation. Generalized temporal curves of CT and laboratory measurements were correlated. Lung opacities appeared 3.4 ± 2.2 days prior to symptom onset. Opacity peaked 1 day after symptom onset. GGO onset was earlier and resolved later than consolidation. Lactate dehydrogenase, and C-reactive protein peaked earlier than procalcitonin and leukopenia. The temporal relationships of quantitative CT features and clinical labs have distinctive patterns and peaks in relation to symptom onset, which may inform early clinical course in patients with mild COVID-19 pneumonia, or may shed light upon chronic lung effects or mechanisms of medical countermeasures in clinical trials.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Clinical Chemistry Tests , Hematologic Tests , Thorax/diagnostic imaging , Adult , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/virology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Severity of Illness Index , Thorax/pathology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
8.
J Clin Imaging Sci ; 10: 42, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1059749

ABSTRACT

Clinical manifestation of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) varies from asymptomatic to severe clinical forms that can result in acute respiratory distress syndrome or in multiple organ dysfunction syndromes. There are no guidelines, based on randomized controlled trials, for the treatment of COVID-19 patients. The treatment is based on antiviral drugs, invasive and non-invasive ventilation supports, and anticoagulant therapy. This is a pictorial essay covering the multiple adverse events encountered during the treatment of COVID-19 patients in an area with a high pandemic incidence. Adverse events are defined as unexpected events following treatment for the infection. The cases described would be useful in aiding early diagnosis, limiting and improving the management of serious complications for patients, and allowing rapid and appropriate treatment.

9.
Radiol Med ; 126(5): 722-728, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1037984

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Preliminary reports suggest a hypercoagulable state in COVID-19. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is perceived as a frequent finding in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, but data describing the prevalence of DVT are lacking. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to report the prevalence of DVT in COVID-19 patients in general wards, blinded to symptoms/signs of disease, using lower extremities duplex ultrasound (LEDUS) in random patients. We tested the association of DVT with clinical, laboratory and inflammatory markers and also reported on the secondary endpoint of in-hospital mortality. PATIENTS/METHODS: n  = 263 COVID-19 patients were screened with LEDUS between March 01, 2020 and April 05, 2020 out of the overall n = 1012 admitted with COVID-19. RESULTS: DVT was detected in n = 67 screened patients (25.5%), n = 41 patients (15.6%) died during the index hospitalization. Multiple logistic regression demonstrated that only C-reactive protein (odds ratio 1.009, 95% CI 1.004-1.013, p < 0.001) was independently associated with the presence of DVT at LEDUS. Both age (odds ratio 1.101, 95% CI 1.054-1.150, p < 0.001) and C-reactive protein (odds ratio 1.012, 95% CI 1.006-1.018, p < 0.001) were instead significantly independently associated with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The main study finding is that DVT prevalence in COVID-19 patients admitted to general wards is 25.5%, suggesting it may be reasonable to screen COVID-19 patients for this potentially severe but treatable complication, and that inflammation, measured with serum C-reactive protein, is the main variable associated with the presence of DVT, where all other clinical or laboratory variables, age or D-dimer included, are instead not independently associated with DVT.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Venous Thrombosis/epidemiology , Venous Thrombosis/etiology , Aged , COVID-19 Testing , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Lower Extremity/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex , Venous Thrombosis/diagnosis
10.
Intern Emerg Med ; 16(5): 1223-1229, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1002167

ABSTRACT

We conducted an observational cohort study in adult patients consecutively admitted for the respiratory illness Covid-19 to our hub hospital from March 9 to April 7, 2020. The high observed rate of venous thromboembolism prompted us to increase the prophylactic doses of enoxaparin from 40 mg daily up to 1 mg/kg twice daily in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU), 0.7 mg/kg twice daily in high-intensity of care wards and 1 mg/kg daily in low-intensity of care wards. Patients on high enoxaparin doses were compared to those who received prophylaxis with the standard dosage. Efficacy endpoints were mortality, clinical deterioration, and the occurrence of venous thromboembolism, safety endpoint was the occurrence of major bleeding. Of 278 patients with Covid-19, 127 received prophylaxis with high enoxaparin doses and 151 with standard dosage. At 21 days, the incidence rate of death and clinical deterioration were lower in patients on higher doses than in those on the standard dosage (hazard ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.62), and the incidence of venous thromboembolism was also lower (hazard ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.26-1.05). Major bleeding occurred in four of 127 patients (3.1%) on the high enoxaparin dosage. In conclusion, in the cohort of patients with Covid-19 treated with high enoxaparin dosages we observed a 60% reduction of mortality and clinical deterioration and a 50% reduction of venous thromboembolism compared to standard dosage prophylaxis. However, 3% of patients on high enoxaparin dosages had non-fatal major bleeding.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/administration & dosage , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis/classification , Aged , Body Mass Index , COVID-19/mortality , Cohort Studies , Enoxaparin/administration & dosage , Enoxaparin/classification , Female , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/classification , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis/methods , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis/statistics & numerical data , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control
11.
Intern Emerg Med ; 16(5): 1173-1181, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-935323

ABSTRACT

To describe radiographic key patterns on Chest X-ray (CXR) in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, assessing the prevalence of radiographic signs of interstitial pneumonia. To evaluate pattern variation between a baseline and a follow-up CXR. 1117 patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection were retrospectively enrolled from four centers in Lombardy region. All patients underwent a CXR at presentation. Follow-up CXR was performed when clinically indicated. Two radiologists in each center reviewed images and classified them as suggestive or not for interstitial pneumonia, recording the presence of ground-glass opacity (GGO), reticular pattern or consolidation and their distribution. Pearson's χ2 test for categorical variables and McNemar test (χ2 for paired data) were performed. Patients mean age 63.3 years, 767 were males (65.5%). The main result is the large proportion of positive CXR in COVID-19 patients. Baseline CXR was positive in 940 patients (80.3%), with significant differences in age and sex distribution between patients with positive and negative CXR. 382 patients underwent a follow-up CXR. The most frequent pattern on baseline CXR was the GGO (66.1%), on follow-up was consolidation (53.4%). The most common distributions were peripheral and middle-lower lung zone. We described key-patterns and their distribution on CXR in a large cohort of COVID-19 patients: GGO was the most frequent finding on baseline CXR, while we found an increase in the proportion of lung consolidation on follow-up CXR. CXR proved to be a reliable tool in our cohort obtaining positive results in 80.3% of the baseline cases.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Radiography, Thoracic/statistics & numerical data , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods
13.
Diagn Interv Radiol ; 27(1): 20-27, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-724074

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Chest X-ray plays a key role in diagnosis and management of COVID-19 patients and imaging features associated with clinical elements may assist with the development or validation of automated image analysis tools. We aimed to identify associations between clinical and radiographic features as well as to assess the feasibility of deep learning applied to chest X-rays in the setting of an acute COVID-19 outbreak. METHODS: A retrospective study of X-rays, clinical, and laboratory data was performed from 48 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive patients (age 60±17 years, 15 women) between February 22 and March 6, 2020 from a tertiary care hospital in Milan, Italy. Sixty-five chest X-rays were reviewed by two radiologists for alveolar and interstitial opacities and classified by severity on a scale from 0 to 3. Clinical factors (age, symptoms, comorbidities) were investigated for association with opacity severity and also with placement of central line or endotracheal tube. Deep learning models were then trained for two tasks: lung segmentation and opacity detection. Imaging characteristics were compared to clinical datapoints using the unpaired student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test. Cohen's kappa analysis was used to evaluate the concordance of deep learning to conventional radiologist interpretation. RESULTS: Fifty-six percent of patients presented with alveolar opacities, 73% had interstitial opacities, and 23% had normal X-rays. The presence of alveolar or interstitial opacities was statistically correlated with age (P = 0.008) and comorbidities (P = 0.005). The extent of alveolar or interstitial opacities on baseline X-ray was significantly associated with the presence of endotracheal tube (P = 0.0008 and P = 0.049) or central line (P = 0.003 and P = 0.007). In comparison to human interpretation, the deep learning model achieved a kappa concordance of 0.51 for alveolar opacities and 0.71 for interstitial opacities. CONCLUSION: Chest X-ray analysis in an acute COVID-19 outbreak showed that the severity of opacities was associated with advanced age, comorbidities, as well as acuity of care. Artificial intelligence tools based upon deep learning of COVID-19 chest X-rays are feasible in the acute outbreak setting.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Deep Learning/statistics & numerical data , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Thorax/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19/virology , Comorbidity , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Radiography, Thoracic/classification , Radiologists , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Thorax/pathology
14.
J Vasc Access ; 22(4): 654-657, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-723976

ABSTRACT

This report aims to illustrate how to perform a venous access to a COVID-19 patient at the bedside. The decision on the type of venous access, the selection of the material necessary to perform the procedure, and the preparation of the operators are described. The described approach can reduce costs, speed up execution times, and make the operator's work safer. Furthermore, these precautions may help control the spread of COVID-19 within the healthcare facility.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Catheterization, Central Venous/methods , Central Venous Catheters , Pandemics , Point-of-Care Testing , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Radiography, Interventional/methods , SARS-CoV-2
15.
J Ultrasound ; 24(2): 165-173, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-718543

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Aim of the study is to evaluate the incidence of DVT in COVID-19 patients and its correlation with the severity of the disease and with clinical and laboratory findings. METHODS: 234 symptomatic patients with COVID-19, diagnosed according to the World Health Organization guidelines, were included in the study. The severity of the disease was classified as moderate, severe and critical. Doppler ultrasound (DUS) was performed in all patients. DUS findings, clinical, laboratory's and therapeutic variables were investigated by contingency tables, Pearson chi square test and by Student t test and Fisher's exact test. ROC curve analysis was applied to study significant continuous variables. RESULTS: Overall incidence of DVT was 10.7% (25/234): 1.6% (1/60) among moderate cases, 13.8% (24/174) in severely and critically ill patients. Prolonged bedrest and intensive care unit admission were significantly associated with the presence of DVT (19.7%). Fraction of inspired oxygen, P/F ratio, respiratory rate, heparin administration, D-dimer, IL-6, ferritin and CRP showed correlation with DVT. CONCLUSION: DUS may be considered a useful and valid tool for early identification of DVT. In less severely affected patients, DUS as screening of DVT might be unnecessary. High rate of DVT found in severe patients and its correlation with respiratory parameters and some significant laboratory findings suggests that these can be used as a screening tool for patients who should be getting DUS.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex/methods , Venous Thrombosis/complications , Venous Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Critical Illness , Early Diagnosis , Ferritins/blood , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/metabolism , Heparin/administration & dosage , Heparin/blood , Humans , Incidence , Intensive Care Units , Interleukin-6/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Oxygen/metabolism , Respiratory Rate , Risk Assessment , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Venous Thrombosis/blood
16.
Nat Commun ; 11(1): 4080, 2020 08 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-717116

ABSTRACT

Chest CT is emerging as a valuable diagnostic tool for clinical management of COVID-19 associated lung disease. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to aid in rapid evaluation of CT scans for differentiation of COVID-19 findings from other clinical entities. Here we show that a series of deep learning algorithms, trained in a diverse multinational cohort of 1280 patients to localize parietal pleura/lung parenchyma followed by classification of COVID-19 pneumonia, can achieve up to 90.8% accuracy, with 84% sensitivity and 93% specificity, as evaluated in an independent test set (not included in training and validation) of 1337 patients. Normal controls included chest CTs from oncology, emergency, and pneumonia-related indications. The false positive rate in 140 patients with laboratory confirmed other (non COVID-19) pneumonias was 10%. AI-based algorithms can readily identify CT scans with COVID-19 associated pneumonia, as well as distinguish non-COVID related pneumonias with high specificity in diverse patient populations.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Coronavirus Infections/diagnostic imaging , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Child , Child, Preschool , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Deep Learning , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , SARS-CoV-2 , Young Adult
17.
Med Oncol ; 37(9): 83, 2020 Aug 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-706674

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has deeply impacted the activity of interventional oncology in cancer centers. Since the first COVID case was diagnosed in Italy on February 21st, our Hospital, located in Milan downtown, has been at the frontline to manage this emergency and to try to ensure essential services. In the present article, we discuss the changes that need to be done for the organization, safety, and patient management in interventional oncology.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Medical Oncology/standards , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Tertiary Care Centers/standards , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Health Personnel/standards , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Medical Oncology/methods , Neoplasms/therapy , Pandemics , Personal Protective Equipment/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Workflow
18.
Radiol Med ; 125(9): 894-901, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-639965

ABSTRACT

Preparedness for the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and its spread in Italy called for setting up of adequately equipped and dedicated health facilities to manage sick patients while protecting healthcare workers, uninfected patients, and the community. In our country, in a short time span, the demand for critical care beds exceeded supply. A new sequestered hospital completely dedicated to intensive care (IC) for isolated COVID-19 patients needed to be designed, constructed, and deployed. Along with this new initiative, the new concept of "Pandemic Radiology Unit" was implemented as a practical solution to the emerging crisis, born out of a critical and urgent acute need. The present article describes logistics, planning, and practical design issues for such a pandemic radiology and critical care unit (e.g., space, infection control, safety of healthcare workers, etc.) adopted in the IC Hospital Unit for the care and management of COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Hospital Design and Construction , Hospitals, Isolation/organization & administration , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Humans , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Italy/epidemiology , Personal Protective Equipment , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling/organization & administration , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Radiography , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/instrumentation , Ultrasonography
20.
IDCases ; 21: e00805, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-379145

ABSTRACT

This is an illustrated case about CT ventilation and perfusion in Covid patient.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL